This story was initially printed by Grist. Join Grist’s weekly newsletter here.
Earlier this 12 months, the e-commerce company Amazon secured approval to open two new data centers in Santiago, Chile. The $400 million enterprise is the corporate’s first foray into finding its knowledge services, which guzzle large quantities of electrical energy and water with a view to energy cloud computing providers and on-line applications, in Latin America — and in one of the vital water-stressed international locations on the earth, the place residents have protested against the industry’s expansion.
This week, the tech large made a separate however associated announcement. It plans to spend money on water conservation alongside the Maipo River, which is the first supply of water for the Santiago area. Amazon will accomplice with a water expertise startup to assist farmers alongside the river set up drip irrigation programs on 165 acres of farmland. The plan is poised to preserve sufficient water to produce round 300 properties per 12 months, and it’s a part of Amazon’s marketing campaign to make its cloud computing operations “water optimistic” by 2030, that means the corporate’s net providers division will preserve or replenish extra water than it makes use of up.
The reasoning behind this water initiative is obvious: Information facilities require giant quantities of water to chill their servers, and Amazon plans to spend $100 billion to construct extra of them over the subsequent decade as a part of an enormous wager on its Amazon Net Providers cloud-computing platform. Different tech corporations resembling Microsoft and Meta, that are additionally investing in knowledge facilities to maintain the artificial-intelligence growth, have made similar water pledges amid a rising controversy concerning the sector’s thirst for water and energy.
Amazon claims that its knowledge facilities are already among the many most water-efficient within the trade, and it plans to roll out extra conservation initiatives to mitigate its thirst. Nevertheless, similar to company pledges to succeed in “net-zero” emissions, these water pledges are extra complicated than they appear at first look. Whereas the corporate has certainly taken steps to chop water utilization at its services, its calculations don’t account for the huge water wants of the ability crops that maintain the lights on at these exact same services. With no bigger dedication to mitigating Amazon’s underlying stress on electrical energy grids, conservation efforts by the corporate and its fellow tech giants will solely deal with a part of the issue, in response to consultants who spoke to Grist.
The highly effective servers in giant knowledge facilities run sizzling as they course of unprecedented quantities of data, and holding them from overheating requires each water and electrical energy. Somewhat than attempt to maintain these rooms cool with conventional air-conditioning items, many corporations use water as a coolant, operating it previous the servers to sit back them out. The facilities additionally want large quantities of electrical energy to run all their servers: They already account for round 3 % of U.S. energy demand, a quantity that might more than double by 2030. On prime of that, the coal, gasoline, and nuclear energy crops that produce that electrical energy themselves eat even bigger portions of water to remain cool.
Will Hewes, who leads water sustainability for Amazon Net Providers, advised Grist that the corporate makes use of water in its knowledge facilities with a view to save on energy-intensive air con items, thus decreasing its reliance on fossil fuels.
“Utilizing water for cooling in most locations actually reduces the quantity of vitality that we use, and so it helps us meet different sustainability targets,” he stated. “We may at all times resolve to not use water for cooling, however we wish to, rather a lot, due to these vitality and effectivity advantages.”
With the intention to save on vitality prices, the corporate’s knowledge facilities must evaporate tens of millions of gallons of water per 12 months. It’s onerous to say for certain how a lot water the information middle trade consumes, however the ballpark estimates are substantial. One 2021 research found that U.S. knowledge facilities consumed round 415,000 acre-feet of water in 2018, even earlier than the artificial-intelligence growth. That’s sufficient to produce round one million common properties yearly, or about as a lot as California’s Imperial Valley takes from the Colorado River annually to develop winter greens. One other research discovered that knowledge facilities operated by Microsoft, Google, and Meta withdrew twice as a lot water from rivers and aquifers as your entire nation of Denmark.
It’s virtually sure that this quantity has ballooned even greater lately as corporations have constructed extra facilities to maintain up with the artificial-intelligence growth, since AI applications resembling ChatGPT require large quantities of server actual property. Tech corporations have constructed tons of of latest knowledge facilities in the previous couple of years alone, and they’re planning tons of extra. One current estimate discovered that ChatGPT requires an average-sized bottle of water for each 10 to 50 chat responses it gives. The on-site water consumption at any one in all these corporations’ knowledge facilities may now rival that of a major beverage company resembling PepsiCo.
Amazon doesn’t present statistics on its absolute water consumption; Hewes advised Grist the corporate is “targeted on effectivity.” Nevertheless, the tech large’s water utilization is probably going decrease than a few of its opponents — partially as a result of the corporate has constructed most of its knowledge facilities with so-called evaporative cooling programs, which require far much less water than different cooling applied sciences and solely activate when temperatures get too excessive. The corporate pegs its water utilization at round 10 % of the trade common, and in temperate places resembling Sweden, it doesn’t use any water to chill down knowledge facilities besides throughout peak summer season temperatures.
Corporations can scale back the environmental influence of their AI enterprise by constructing them in temperate areas which have loads of water, however they have to stability these effectivity considerations with considerations about land and electrical energy prices, in addition to the have to be near main prospects. Current research have discovered that data center water consumption in the U.S. is “skewed towards water careworn subbasins” in locations just like the Southwest, however Amazon has clustered much of its business farther east, particularly in Virginia, which boasts cheap power and monetary incentives for tech corporations.
“Loads of the places are pushed by buyer wants, but in addition by [prices for] actual property and energy,” stated Hewes. “Some massive parts of our knowledge middle footprint are in locations that aren’t tremendous sizzling, that aren’t in tremendous water careworn areas. Virginia, Ohio — they get sizzling in the summertime, however then there are massive chunks of the 12 months the place we don’t want to make use of water for cooling.” Even so, the corporate’s enlargement in Virginia is already inflicting considerations over water availability.
To mitigate its impacts in such basins, the corporate additionally funds dozens of conservation and recharge initiatives just like the one in Chile. It donates recycled water from its knowledge facilities to farmers, who use it to irrigate their crops, and it has additionally helped restore the rivers that offer water-stressed cities resembling Cape Town, South Africa; in northern Virginia, it has labored to install cover crop farmland that may scale back runoff air pollution in native waterways. The corporate treats these initiatives the way in which different corporations deal with carbon offsets, counting every gallon recharged towards a gallon it consumes at its knowledge facilities. Amazon stated in its most recent sustainability report that it’s 41 % of the way in which to assembly its aim of being “water optimistic.” In different phrases, it has funded initiatives that recharge or preserve slightly over 4 gallons of water for each 10 gallons of water it makes use of.
However regardless of all this, the corporate’s water stewardship aim doesn’t embrace the water consumed by the ability crops that offer its knowledge facilities. This consumption could be as a lot as three to 10 occasions as giant because the on-site water consumption at a knowledge middle, in response to Shaolei Ren, a professor of engineering on the College of California, Riverside, who research knowledge middle water utilization. For example, Ren pointed to an Amazon data center in Pennsylvania that depends on a nuclear power plant less than a mile away. That knowledge middle makes use of round 20 % of the ability plant’s capability.
“They are saying they’re utilizing little or no water, however there’s an enormous water evaporation occurring simply close by, and that’s for powering their knowledge middle,” he stated.
Corporations like Amazon can scale back this secondary water utilization by counting on renewable vitality sources, which don’t require wherever close to as a lot water as conventional energy crops. Hewes says the corporate has been making an attempt to “handle down” each water and vitality wants via a separate aim of working on 100 percent renewable energy, however Ren factors out that the corporate’s knowledge facilities want round the clock energy, which suggests intermittently out there renewables like photo voltaic and wind farms can solely go to date.
Amazon isn’t the one firm coping with this downside. CyrusOne, one other main knowledge middle agency, revealed in its sustainability report earlier this 12 months that it used greater than eight occasions as a lot water to supply energy because it did on-site at its knowledge facilities.
“So long as we’re reliant on grid electrical energy that features thermoelectric sources to energy our services, we’re not directly answerable for the consumption of huge quantities of water within the manufacturing of that electrical energy,” the report stated.
As for replenishment initiatives just like the one in Chile, they too will solely go a part of the way in which towards decreasing the influence of the information middle explosion. Even when Amazon’s cloud operations are “water optimistic” on a world scale, with initiatives in lots of the similar basins the place it owns knowledge facilities, that doesn’t imply it gained’t nonetheless compromise water entry in particular watersheds. The corporate’s knowledge facilities and their energy crops should still withdraw extra water than the corporate replenishes in a given space, and replenishment initiatives in different aquifers all over the world gained’t tackle the bodily penalties of that particular overdraft.
“If they’re able to seize a few of the rising water and clear it and return to the group, that’s higher than nothing, however I believe it’s not likely decreasing the precise consumption,” Ren stated. “It masks out quite a lot of actual issues, as a result of water is a very regional situation.”
Correction: This story has been corrected to make clear that Amazon’s “water optimistic” pledge applies solely to its net providers division.
This text initially appeared in Grist. Grist is a nonprofit, unbiased media group devoted to telling tales of local weather options and a simply future. Be taught extra at Grist.org.
Trending Merchandise
